Calculators8 min readUpdated: 2026-09-15

Income Shares Model vs Percentage of Income: Child Support Formulas Compared

Quick Verdict & Summary

The Income Shares model pools both parents' incomes to simulate total intact-family child expenditures and divides costs proportionately, adjusting directly for overnight custody. The Percentage of Income model looks exclusively at the paying parent's income, applying a flat percentage (e.g. 20% for 1 child) regardless of what the custodial parent earns or how parenting time is shared.

Feature Matrix: Income Shares Model vs Percentage of Income Model

FeatureIncome Shares ModelPercentage of Income Model
State Adoption41+ US States (including IL, IN, FL, CA, NY, OH)~6 US States (including TX, WI, NV, MS, ND)
Considers Custodial Income?Yes (Pooled combined income)No (Strictly ignores custodial income)
Overnight Timesharing AdjustmentGraduated credits for overnight visitationRarely adjusts without formal judicial deviation
Healthcare & Daycare Add-OnsDivided proportionally based on income sharesAdded on top of flat percentage

Income Shares Model

An economic child support framework pooling both parents' incomes and dividing the child's financial needs proportionately.

Key Advantages

  • Considers both parents' earnings fairly, avoiding disproportionate burdens.
  • Smoothly integrates overnight parenting time credits for shared custody.
  • Reflects real-world marginal costs of child-rearing at various income tiers.

Limitations

  • More complex mathematical formulas requiring financial disclosure from both sides.
  • Can lead to frequent recalculation disputes if parental incomes fluctuate.
Best For: Modern dual-income households, shared joint custody, and states prioritizing proportionality.
Try Child Support Calculator

Percentage of Income Model

A traditional child support model establishing support strictly as a flat percentage of the non-custodial parent's income.

Key Advantages

  • Simple, predictable, and transparent math with fewer disputes.
  • Custodial parent's income does not need to be verified or disclosed.

Limitations

  • Ignores high-earning custodial parents whose children need less transfer support.
  • Often punishes paying parents who exercise significant overnight custody.
Best For: Sole custody arrangements with minimal overnight visitation (e.g., Texas, Wisconsin, Nevada).

1. Why Most States Shifted to the Income Shares Framework

In early family law, mothers rarely participated in the full-time workforce, making the percentage-of-obligor model practical. As female labor participation and dual-earning households became the norm, states realized that applying a flat 20% or 25% to a father's paycheck made little economic sense when the mother earned an executive salary. The Income Shares model accounts for both parental balance sheets.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which child support model yields higher payments?

It depends on the custodial parent's income. When the custodial parent has low or zero earnings, the Income Shares model often produces higher support. When the custodial parent earns more than the paying parent, the Income Shares model results in substantially lower payments.

Related In-Depth Technical Guides